Home ›
Banks › U.S. Bank National Association
U.S. Bank National Association
Cincinnati, OH · FDIC cert 6548
· class N
· primary regulator OCC
· charter OCC
· holding company U S Bcorp
total assets $705,555mn
· band over $100bn
· established 1863
· Call Report 2026Q2 · branches from the 2026 Summary of Deposits
The public record, as the regulator reads it. Every number on this page is from an FDIC filing
or a public loan-level tape; every line is the regulator's own; nothing is scored, summed or graded.
This bank is over neither of SR 06-26's two criteria.
Where its branches areBranches as of 30 June 2026 · FDIC Summary of Deposits
A state is filled where this bank has a branch; a bubble is a metro of the CRE spine, sized by how many of the bank's branches are in it. Presence only — a branch is a building in a ZIP, and no dollar is allocated to any place on this map.
States · 292,097 branches
Every jurisdiction the Summary of Deposits lists a branch in; the map fills these, and a row the projection cannot draw says so rather than disappearing.
The deposit column sums to $532.9B, the deposits booked at domestic branches on 2026-06-30. Deposits are booked to an office, not earned in a market — the largest single booking is Cincinnati, OH, 16.9% of the bank's; read the branch counts as the bank's presence, not the dollars.
| state | branches | of the bank's | deposits booked | of deposits |
| CA |
563 |
26.8% |
$115.1B |
21.6% |
| OH |
161 |
7.7% |
$103.6B |
19.5% |
| IL |
153 |
7.3% |
$19.5B |
3.7% |
| WA |
136 |
6.5% |
$23.1B |
4.3% |
| MO |
129 |
6.2% |
$24.2B |
4.5% |
| OR |
114 |
5.4% |
$22.2B |
4.2% |
| MN |
105 |
5.0% |
$106.5B |
20.0% |
| CO |
102 |
4.9% |
$19.6B |
3.7% |
| WI |
90 |
4.3% |
$33.8B |
6.3% |
| KY |
69 |
3.3% |
$6.6B |
1.2% |
| AZ |
56 |
2.7% |
$4.9B |
0.9% |
| IA |
55 |
2.6% |
$7.9B |
1.5% |
| TN |
55 |
2.6% |
$5.8B |
1.1% |
| ID |
51 |
2.4% |
$6.8B |
1.3% |
| NV |
50 |
2.4% |
$8.9B |
1.7% |
| UT |
39 |
1.9% |
$3.8B |
0.7% |
| NE |
34 |
1.6% |
$3.9B |
0.7% |
| KS |
23 |
1.1% |
$3.8B |
0.7% |
| NM |
21 |
1.0% |
$2.4B |
0.5% |
| AR |
18 |
0.9% |
$1.2B |
0.2% |
| MT |
17 |
0.8% |
$3.2B |
0.6% |
| ND |
15 |
0.7% |
$2.0B |
0.4% |
| SD |
10 |
0.5% |
$1.5B |
0.3% |
| WY |
9 |
0.4% |
$897M |
0.2% |
| IN |
8 |
0.4% |
$861M |
0.2% |
| NC |
7 |
0.3% |
$380M |
0.1% |
| FL |
3 |
0.1% |
$114M |
0.0% |
| TX |
3 |
0.1% |
$107M |
0.0% |
| GA |
1 |
0.0% |
under $1M |
0.0% |
The lines · 2026Q2 Call Report
SR 06-26 (the 2006 interagency guidance on CRE concentrations), the Prompt Corrective Action capital lines
(12 CFR 324.403) on the filer's own basis, and the FDIC's brokered-deposit line (12 CFR 327.16). A value on the far
side of its line is colored; that is the whole of what a crossed line means here.
| line | this bank | the line | the rule |
| Investor CRE / total risk-based capital |
57% total 70% |
≥ 300% |
construction, multifamily and non-owner-occupied nonfarm nonresidential over total risk-based capital — the first half of criterion 2; owner-occupied excluded, as the guidance excludes it. "Total" beneath adds it back. |
| Construction & land loans / capital |
12.9% |
≥ 100% |
construction, land development and other land loans over total risk-based capital — criterion 1 of the 2006 interagency guidance |
| CRE book growth, 36 months |
0.3% |
≥ 50% |
the supervisory CRE book (owner-occupied excluded) against the same bank twelve quarters earlier — the second half of criterion 2, which the 300% line alone does not state |
| Total risk-based capital ratio |
14.9% |
< 10% |
total risk-based capital over risk-weighted assets; well capitalized at 10%, adequately at 8%. A CBLR filer reports none and is printed as not reported |
| Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio |
13.0% |
< 8% |
tier 1 capital over risk-weighted assets; well capitalized at 8%, adequately at 6%. A CBLR filer reports none and is printed as not reported |
| Tier 1 leverage ratio |
9.5% |
< 5% |
tier 1 capital over average assets; well capitalized at 5% for a risk-based filer, and the CBLR framework's own 9% line for a leverage-only filer |
| Brokered deposits / assets |
4.7% |
≥ 10% |
brokered deposits over total assets; above 10% they begin to count in the FDIC's assessment formula (12 CFR 327.16) |
Criterion 1 is construction at or above 100% of capital:
not over.
Criterion 2 is BOTH halves — investor CRE at or above 300% of capital AND the book grown 50% or more in 36 months
(from the tape's own quarter, 2023Q2):
not over.
Capital is read on the risk-based basis this bank files on.
Its market · branches as of 30 June 2026
A branch is a building in a ZIP (FDIC Summary of Deposits); no dollar is allocated to any metro. For each metro this bank has a branch in:
the Hotspots reading (retail and office, each elevated or not against a bar set at the top quartile of the 298 metros with both readings — a relative cut, not a regulator's line),
the public CMBS tape in the metro, and the counts behind the doors.
157 metros, by branch count.
198 branches · 9% of the bank's
Hotspots cell
retail
retail elevated · office not elevated · WARN-corroborated
CMBS in the metro
656 loans
2.4% distressed · retail 0.7% · office 4.2%
Behind the door
166 on the forward watch
$5,028mn not yet in special servicing · 31 in special servicing with commentary · 47 WARN notices in 90 days (4,792 jobs)
114 branches · 5% of the bank's
Hotspots cell
retail & office
retail elevated · office elevated · WARN-corroborated
CMBS in the metro
365 loans
8.0% distressed · retail 2.9% · office 16.9%
Behind the door
75 on the forward watch
$2,130mn not yet in special servicing · 31 in special servicing with commentary · 20 WARN notices in 90 days (2,292 jobs)
77 branches · 4% of the bank's
Hotspots cell
retail & office
retail elevated · office elevated
CMBS in the metro
64 loans
3.1% distressed · retail 0.0% · office 10.4%
Behind the door
18 on the forward watch
$450mn not yet in special servicing · 1 in special servicing with commentary · 1 WARN notice in 90 days (102 jobs)
72 branches · 3% of the bank's
Hotspots cell
retail & office
retail elevated · office elevated · WARN-corroborated
CMBS in the metro
73 loans
6.6% distressed · retail 1.9% · office 9.4%
Behind the door
17 on the forward watch
$285mn not yet in special servicing · 3 in special servicing with commentary · 5 WARN notices in 90 days (366 jobs)
71 branches · 3% of the bank's
Hotspots cell
retail
retail elevated · office not elevated · WARN-corroborated
CMBS in the metro
189 loans
0.0% distressed · retail 0.0% · office 0.0%
Behind the door
28 on the forward watch
$576mn not yet in special servicing · 5 in special servicing with commentary · 12 WARN notices in 90 days (841 jobs)
70 branches · 3% of the bank's
Hotspots cell
retail
retail elevated · office not elevated · WARN-corroborated
CMBS in the metro
154 loans
3.9% distressed · retail 2.7% · office 7.2%
Behind the door
44 on the forward watch
$1,793mn not yet in special servicing · 7 in special servicing with commentary · 38 WARN notices in 90 days (4,625 jobs)
68 branches · 3% of the bank's
Hotspots cell
retail
retail elevated · office not elevated · WARN-corroborated
CMBS in the metro
146 loans
0.7% distressed · retail 3.1% · office 0.0%
Behind the door
26 on the forward watch
$699mn not yet in special servicing · 1 in special servicing with commentary · 19 WARN notices in 90 days (993 jobs)
64 branches · 3% of the bank's
Hotspots cell
retail only read
retail elevated · office not read · WARN-corroborated
CMBS in the metro
66 loans
11.1% distressed · retail 0.0% · office 9.6%
Behind the door
17 on the forward watch
$309mn not yet in special servicing · 8 in special servicing with commentary · 15 WARN notices in 90 days (2,392 jobs)
59 branches · 3% of the bank's
Hotspots cell
retail
retail elevated · office not elevated · WARN-corroborated
CMBS in the metro
63 loans
4.8% distressed · retail 7.8% · office 0.0%
Behind the door
21 on the forward watch
$378mn not yet in special servicing · 2 in special servicing with commentary · 9 WARN notices in 90 days (601 jobs)
58 branches · 3% of the bank's
Hotspots cell
retail
retail elevated · office not elevated · WARN-corroborated
CMBS in the metro
212 loans
3.3% distressed · retail 0.0% · office 6.6%
Behind the door
65 on the forward watch
$2,829mn not yet in special servicing · 11 in special servicing with commentary · 39 WARN notices in 90 days (4,682 jobs)
54 branches · 3% of the bank's
Hotspots cell
neither
retail not elevated · office not elevated · WARN-corroborated
CMBS in the metro
95 loans
4.2% distressed · retail 0.0% · office 15.0%
Behind the door
18 on the forward watch
$511mn not yet in special servicing · 9 in special servicing with commentary · 5 WARN notices in 90 days (274 jobs)
46 branches · 2% of the bank's
Hotspots cell
retail
retail elevated · office not elevated · WARN-corroborated
CMBS in the metro
206 loans
0.5% distressed · retail 0.0% · office 2.4%
Behind the door
34 on the forward watch
$716mn not yet in special servicing · 0 in special servicing with commentary · 20 WARN notices in 90 days (921 jobs)
The remaining 145 metros, by branch count — the same reading, one row each:
| metro | branches | hotspots cell | CMBS loans | distressed | on the watch |
| Milwaukee-Waukesha, WI |
37 |
retail |
81 |
1.2% |
11 |
| Kansas City, MO-KS |
37 |
retail only read |
67 |
3.0% |
26 |
| Cleveland, OH |
37 |
retail & office |
100 |
4.2% |
28 |
| Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA |
32 |
retail |
102 |
1.5% |
27 |
| Columbus, OH |
31 |
retail & office |
84 |
1.4% |
24 |
| San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA |
29 |
neither |
92 |
1.1% |
32 |
| Las Vegas-Henderson-North Las Vegas, NV |
29 |
neither |
178 |
0.6% |
34 |
| Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TN |
28 |
neither |
69 |
2.2% |
16 |
| Boise City, ID |
24 |
neither |
23 |
0.0% |
4 |
| Omaha, NE-IA |
21 |
office |
16 |
0.3% |
5 |
| Salt Lake City-Murray, UT |
20 |
neither |
41 |
2.4% |
13 |
| Louisville/Jefferson County, KY-IN |
18 |
retail & office |
26 |
9.5% |
7 |
| Des Moines-West Des Moines, IA |
13 |
neither |
15 |
0.0% |
2 |
| Reno, NV |
13 |
neither |
34 |
0.0% |
4 |
| Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA |
13 |
retail |
45 |
0.0% |
12 |
| Albuquerque, NM |
13 |
retail |
32 |
3.2% |
8 |
| Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek, OH |
12 |
office |
32 |
6.5% |
13 |
| Colorado Springs, CO |
12 |
neither |
32 |
0.0% |
6 |
| Santa Maria-Santa Barbara, CA |
11 |
office |
20 |
0.0% |
3 |
| Salem, OR |
11 |
neither |
10 |
0.0% |
3 |
| Eugene-Springfield, OR |
11 |
neither |
5 |
0.0% |
1 |
| Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway, AR |
11 |
retail |
21 |
0.0% |
4 |
| Madison, WI |
10 |
neither |
7 |
0.0% |
2 |
| Spokane-Spokane Valley, WA |
10 |
neither |
14 |
0.0% |
1 |
| Fresno, CA |
9 |
retail |
21 |
8.4% |
0 |
| Bend, OR |
9 |
neither |
5 |
0.0% |
2 |
| Duluth, MN-WI |
8 |
retail |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Davenport-Moline-Rock Island, IA-IL |
8 |
neither |
9 |
0.0% |
4 |
| Knoxville, TN |
8 |
neither |
17 |
0.0% |
2 |
| Ogden, UT |
8 |
neither |
13 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Lincoln, NE |
7 |
neither |
6 |
0.8% |
2 |
| Springfield, MO |
7 |
office only read |
7 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Bakersfield-Delano, CA |
7 |
neither |
14 |
10.3% |
1 |
| Stockton-Lodi, CA |
7 |
neither |
20 |
0.0% |
2 |
| Akron, OH |
7 |
office |
32 |
3.2% |
8 |
| Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC-SC |
7 |
retail only read |
93 |
3.2% |
22 |
| Fargo, ND-MN |
6 |
neither |
5 |
1.0% |
1 |
| Sioux Falls, SD-MN |
6 |
retail only read |
6 |
0.0% |
1 |
| Kennewick-Richland, WA |
6 |
neither |
5 |
0.0% |
1 |
| Santa Cruz-Watsonville, CA |
6 |
office |
7 |
0.0% |
1 |
| Bowling Green, KY |
6 |
office only read |
6 |
16.7% |
1 |
| Tucson, AZ |
6 |
retail & office |
57 |
1.8% |
8 |
| Provo-Orem-Lehi, UT |
6 |
neither |
14 |
7.4% |
5 |
| Cedar Rapids, IA |
5 |
office |
1 |
0.0% |
1 |
| Salinas, CA |
5 |
office |
12 |
0.0% |
1 |
| Yakima, WA |
5 |
neither |
5 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Medford, OR |
5 |
neither |
3 |
0.0% |
1 |
| Clarksville, TN-KY |
5 |
office |
6 |
0.0% |
1 |
| Modesto, CA |
5 |
neither |
17 |
0.0% |
4 |
| Fort Collins-Loveland, CO |
5 |
neither |
13 |
0.0% |
3 |
| Joplin, MO-KS |
5 |
office |
2 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Pueblo, CO |
5 |
office |
4 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Rockford, IL |
5 |
retail |
9 |
0.0% |
1 |
| Lexington-Fayette, KY |
5 |
retail |
23 |
4.4% |
1 |
| Billings, MT |
4 |
neither |
2 |
0.0% |
1 |
| Boulder, CO |
4 |
neither |
13 |
0.0% |
2 |
| Redding, CA |
4 |
neither |
4 |
0.0% |
2 |
| Vallejo, CA |
4 |
retail |
18 |
0.0% |
0 |
| San Luis Obispo-Paso Robles, CA |
4 |
office |
13 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Bellingham, WA |
4 |
neither |
4 |
0.0% |
0 |
| St. Cloud, MN |
4 |
office |
3 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Springfield, IL |
4 |
retail |
5 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Topeka, KS |
4 |
neither |
7 |
0.0% |
2 |
| Iowa City, IA |
4 |
office |
2 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Chico, CA |
4 |
neither |
5 |
19.3% |
2 |
| Waterloo-Cedar Falls, IA |
4 |
neither |
3 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Grand Junction, CO |
4 |
neither |
7 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Greeley, CO |
4 |
neither |
7 |
14.3% |
0 |
| Eau Claire, WI |
4 |
office |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Paducah, KY-IL |
4 |
retail only read |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Kenosha, WI |
4 |
neither |
5 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Rapid City, SD |
3 |
neither |
2 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Rochester, MN |
3 |
retail only read |
3 |
0.0% |
1 |
| Ames, IA |
3 |
retail only read |
1 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Lawrence, KS |
3 |
neither |
3 |
33.3% |
1 |
| Coeur d'Alene, ID |
3 |
neither |
7 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Bismarck, ND |
3 |
neither |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Owensboro, KY |
3 |
retail |
1 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Santa Rosa-Petaluma, CA |
3 |
neither |
28 |
3.6% |
7 |
| Great Falls, MT |
3 |
neither |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Visalia, CA |
3 |
neither |
10 |
0.0% |
2 |
| Albany, OR |
3 |
neither |
2 |
0.0% |
0 |
| St. Joseph, MO-KS |
3 |
office |
3 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Columbia, MO |
3 |
office |
2 |
0.0% |
1 |
| Twin Falls, ID |
3 |
office only read |
2 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sioux City, IA-NE-SD |
3 |
neither |
3 |
0.0% |
1 |
| Santa Fe, NM |
3 |
retail & office |
10 |
21.1% |
1 |
| Green Bay, WI |
3 |
office |
7 |
0.0% |
2 |
| Hot Springs, AR |
3 |
neither |
3 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Cape Girardeau, MO-IL |
3 |
no reading |
1 |
0.0% |
1 |
| Corvallis, OR |
3 |
office |
— |
— |
0 |
| Fond du Lac, WI |
3 |
neither |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Wausau, WI |
3 |
neither |
2 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Appleton, WI |
3 |
office |
5 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Huntington-Ashland, WV-KY-OH |
3 |
retail only read |
2 |
28.7% |
0 |
| La Crosse-Onalaska, WI-MN |
2 |
retail only read |
3 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Cheyenne, WY |
2 |
retail |
3 |
1.6% |
0 |
| Missoula, MT |
2 |
office only read |
3 |
0.0% |
1 |
| Bozeman, MT |
2 |
office only read |
4 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater, WA |
2 |
office only read |
12 |
0.0% |
5 |
| Grand Forks, ND-MN |
2 |
neither |
2 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Longview-Kelso, WA |
2 |
neither |
2 |
50.0% |
0 |
| Carson City, NV |
2 |
neither |
3 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Mankato, MN |
2 |
neither |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Mount Vernon-Anacortes, WA |
2 |
neither |
1 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Lewiston, ID-WA |
2 |
neither |
— |
— |
0 |
| Oshkosh-Neenah, WI |
2 |
neither |
4 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sheboygan, WI |
2 |
neither |
2 |
0.0% |
1 |
| Lake Havasu City-Kingman, AZ |
2 |
neither |
4 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Dubuque, IA |
2 |
office |
1 |
0.0% |
0 |
| St. George, UT |
2 |
neither |
2 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Kingsport-Bristol, TN-VA |
2 |
neither |
5 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Bloomington, IL |
2 |
neither |
4 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Las Cruces, NM |
2 |
neither |
2 |
1.9% |
1 |
| Sandusky, OH |
2 |
neither |
2 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH |
2 |
office |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard, WA |
2 |
neither |
5 |
0.0% |
1 |
| Wenatchee-East Wenatchee, WA |
2 |
office |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Morristown, TN |
2 |
office only read |
3 |
0.0% |
1 |
| Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX |
2 |
retail |
271 |
2.6% |
63 |
| Grants Pass, OR |
1 |
neither |
— |
— |
0 |
| Helena, MT |
1 |
neither |
2 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Pocatello, ID |
1 |
neither |
— |
— |
0 |
| El Centro, CA |
1 |
neither |
7 |
0.0% |
1 |
| Idaho Falls, ID |
1 |
office |
3 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Yuba City, CA |
1 |
neither |
3 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Napa, CA |
1 |
neither |
4 |
0.0% |
2 |
| Prescott Valley-Prescott, AZ |
1 |
office only read |
10 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Hanford-Corcoran, CA |
1 |
neither |
3 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Racine-Mount Pleasant, WI |
1 |
office |
3 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Minot, ND |
1 |
office only read |
3 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Walla Walla, WA |
1 |
neither |
1 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Logan, UT-ID |
1 |
neither |
1 |
12.5% |
0 |
| Casper, WY |
1 |
office only read |
2 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL |
1 |
retail |
263 |
0.8% |
57 |
| Grand Island, NE |
1 |
no reading |
— |
— |
0 |
| Mansfield, OH |
1 |
neither |
5 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Janesville-Beloit, WI |
1 |
neither |
3 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Lima, OH |
1 |
neither |
1 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Fort Smith, AR-OK |
1 |
neither |
6 |
0.0% |
1 |
| Jefferson City, MO |
1 |
office |
2 |
2.1% |
0 |
| Naples-Marco Island, FL |
1 |
neither |
8 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX |
1 |
retail & office |
366 |
4.7% |
82 |
| Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA |
1 |
retail only read |
271 |
1.8% |
61 |
| North Port-Bradenton-Sarasota, FL |
1 |
neither |
20 |
0.0% |
3 |
259 of the bank's 2097 branches (12%) sit outside every metro the tape reads; nothing is printed for them.
Peers · the same asset band, nationally and in Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA
Every cohort is inside an asset band (over $100bn), because size moves the concentration ratios more than anything else does. A position is an interval —
the share of the cohort below this bank and the share at or below it differ by the tie — and below 10 banks nothing is ranked.
over $100bn, nationally
32 banks
Investor CRE / capital
56–59th pct
18 below · 1 at the same value · 13 above
Construction / capital
62–66th pct
20 below · 1 at the same value · 11 above
over $100bn, in Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA
12 banks
Investor CRE / capital
42–50th pct
5 below · 1 at the same value · 6 above
Construction / capital
58–67th pct
7 below · 1 at the same value · 4 above
banks with a branch in this metro, from the 2026 Summary of Deposits. This metro holds 198 of the bank's 2097 branches (9%), and 259 are outside any metro area; the bank operates in 157 metros.
Of the 32 banks in the over $100bn band nationally, over each line:
Construction at or above 100% of capital — criterion 1 — 0 of 32 (0.0%); CRE at or above 300% of capital — 0 of 32 (0.0%); ... and the book grew 50% or more in 36 months — criterion 2 — 0 of 32 (0.0%); Over either criterion — 0 of 32 (0.0%); Total risk-based capital below 10% (risk-based filers) — 0 of 32 (0.0%); Tier 1 risk-based capital below 8% (risk-based filers) — 0 of 32 (0.0%); Tier 1 leverage below 5% (risk-based filers) — 0 of 32 (0.0%); Below a well-capitalized line, on the filer's own basis — 0 of 32 (0.0%); Brokered deposits at or above 10% of assets — 7 of 32 (21.9%).
What moves faster than the Call Report
Forward transfer-risk watch
1,195 loans
$30,712mn in this bank's metros scored High or Elevated for transfer to special servicing within two quarters, not yet transferred. The loans are the door.door
In special servicing, with commentary
175 loans
the servicer's own filed narrative, loan by loan. The narratives are the door.door
WARN notices, 90 days
432 notices
49,600 jobs, in this bank's metros, under review. The employers and addresses are the door.door
The four bank lenses
Franchise · Strain · Mark · Consolidation
every bank against every line, the franchise gradient, the mark on the book, the consolidation clock — this bank placed on each.door
Watch dossier
none
no watch dossier has been written for this bank; the absence is a fact about the watchlist, not about the bank.
Boundaries
- The Call Report carries no collateral geography. The footprint is where the branches are (FDIC Summary of Deposits, 30 June 2026), not where the loans are.
- The regulator's lines are absolute (SR 06-26, 12 CFR 324.403, 12 CFR 327.16) and read on the 2026Q2 Call Report; the 36-month growth is from the tape's own quarter, 2023Q2.
- Owner-occupied commercial real estate is excluded from criterion 2, as SR 06-26 excludes it.
- The Hotspots cell is a relative cut — the top quartile of the 298 metros with both readings on each lens (snapshot 2026-10-30) — not a line of any regulator's.
- A capital ratio is read on the filer's own basis (risk-based); a CBLR filer reports no risk-based ratio and none is inferred.
- This page is rebuilt nightly from stored filings; generated 2026-10-30. Banks under the Call Report tape's $100mn floor have no page.
See the whole picture, not just the call report.
These pages publish what every bank files about its commercial real estate book, quarter by quarter. The platform goes inside the filing: concentration against the supervisory lines, loan modifications, where the risk moved when it left the balance sheet, and how much room each of your lenders has left.