Start free trial
No credit card required
Commercial Real Estate Credit —
McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, TX
The state of disclosed CRE credit in this market · TX
The read
$173M of CMBS across 12 loans. The heaviest maturity load lands in 2029 ($91M, 53% of the book). Distress is flat in the filed record — 0.0% as of 2026-07. 2 on-the-ground distress events in the past year.
Overview
CMBS
Submarkets
Local Banks
Jobs & Demand
On The Ground
Loading map…
The CMBS properties our stress model flags here, plus recent store closures and layoffs. Stressed is a wider net than distressed — the distressed figure above counts only loans already in special servicing or 60+ days delinquent, while these dots also include performing loans facing maturity or coverage pressure. Property dots sit at the center of their ZIP code, not the building — they show where stress concentrates, not which asset. Closures and layoffs are pinned to address where we have it. Open any dot to the building and the loan behind it →
CMBS Distressed UPB
under $1M / 0.0%
in special servicing or 60+ days delinquent
CMBS Maturing ≤ 24mo
$56M
Banks HQ’d Here (stressed)
0 / 6
Bank Early-Warning
3 flagged
Store Closures (1y)
2
Layoff Notices (1y)
0 / 0 jobs
CMBS Loans / UPB
12 / $173M
Unemployment · Aug 2026
6.3%
-0.5pp yr
Office-Using Jobs · 2024
34,070
+2.6% yr
How much CRE distress is there in McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, TX right now?
For McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, TX, CRE distress is mixed but with one clear stress point: the bank leg is elevated, with $710.2 million in bank CRE at lenders over the noncurrent line, a 14.66% share of the CRE lent into the metro — ranking 47th by count and 32nd by rate out of 393 metros. The other three legs are not elevated: store closures sit at 0.86 per 100k jobs (rank 179th by count, 277th by rate), WARN layoff notices are at 0.0% (rank 313th/308th), and securitized loans in special servicing are at 0.0% (rank 220th/220th). Across the six pairs, 0 are both elevated, 3 are both quiet, and 3 disagree — all disagreements center on the bank leg being hot while the tenant-facing and CMBS legs are quiet, which reads as lender stress without a visible tenant cause, likely pointing to construction or rate resets rather than vacancy. One of the four signals is elevated overall.
The figures behind this answer
| Signal | Level | Rate | Rank by count | Rank by rate | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| store closures store closures per 100,000 jobs |
2 closures | 0.86 per 100k jobs | 179 of 392 | 277 of 392 | quiet trailing 365 days to today
|
| layoff notices (WARN) workers on layoff notices as a share of the metro's employment |
0 notices | 0% | 313 of 386 | 308 of 386 | quiet trailing 365 days to today
|
| bank CRE at lenders over the noncurrent line share of the CRE lent into this metro that sits at a lender over the blended-noncurrent line |
$710.2mm | 14.66% | 47 of 393 | 32 of 393 | elevated
allocated 2026-03-31
|
| securitized loans in special servicing share of the securitized balance read here that is in special servicing |
0 loan records | 0% | 220 of 335 | 220 of 335 | quiet 2026-07-29
|
6 pairs compared
0 both elevated
3 both quiet
3 disagreeing
0 unreadable — a side is blind
1 of four legs elevated
one metro, four independent feeds, each on its own denominator
114 of 441 metros have at least one blind leg and 48 are blind on all four. Those 48 are the same metros the board's map cannot place and the metro resolver cannot name: one ZIP-to-CBSA crosswalk boundary, showing up three ways.
Elevation is computed on the COUNT, over a flat threshold, which is a size filter. New York is 2nd of 392 by store closures and 264th of the same 392 by closures per job — both true, and which one you lead with decides what the reader believes.
Where two legs disagree, that is usually a fact about WHICH mechanism is running, not an error in either feed and not a worse metro.
A leg with no denominator, or whose numerator cannot be measured, reads LOW and means nothing. Each leg publishes a measurement state (allocated, floor, measured, no denominator, no rate, not measurable) for that reason.
Store closures: divided by 232,984 jobs
— all metro jobs, QCEW annual average — a SIZE normaliser, not a matched population: the feed spans retail, food service and pharmacy and no single QCEW sector covers it. The MATCHED read sits beside it as this leg's second reading (trailing 365 days to today).
Layoff notices (WARN): divided by 378,457 employed
— employed persons, BLS LAUS, not seasonally adjusted (trailing 365 days to today).
Bank CRE at lenders over the noncurrent line: divided by $4,844.4 mm
— bank CRE allocated to this metro by branch deposits (2026-03-31).
Securitized loans in special servicing: divided by $174.0 mm
— current balance on the non-pari-passu rows of this tape — the trust's slice, not the whole loan, on both sides of the ratio (2026-07-29).
Written from the figures above · CBSA 32580 · stress_metro · last changed 28 Aug 2026
· Ask your own question →
Which distress signals are elevated in McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, TX, and which cannot be read?
In McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, TX, the only elevated distress signal is bank_distressed_cre, with distressed lender CRE at $710.2mm and the share of bank CRE at the 90th percentile reaching 24.6%; however, the overall phase reading is “watch” because it is an “isolated signal, not a convergence,” and the materiality is “immaterial” given “little to no distressed CRE dollars behind the signals.” Notably, CMBS special servicing is absent (UPB of $0.0mm, or 0.0% of metro UPB, with 0 loans in special servicing), and no distressed bank assets ($0.0bn) or bank failures are recorded. As for signals that cannot be read, the reading for store closures and WARN notices is unavailable—the provided data only lists counts (2 store closures and 0 WARN notices over one year) but does not supply a distinct distress metric for them. In short, elevated distress is limited to the banking channel, and no broader convergence is evident; a full multi-signal readout (e.g., CMBS or employment-related distress) is not available from the given figures.
The figures behind this answer
- CMBS in special servicing
- $0.0mm
- … as a share of this metro's CMBS balance
- 0.0%
- Bank CRE lent into this metro
- $4.84bn
- … at risk at the 90th percentile
- 24.6%
- CRE at lenders over the noncurrent line
- $710.2mm
- Assets at those lenders
- $0.00bn
- … share needing no branch-deposit allocation
- 5.3%
- Signals reading elevated
- bank CRE over the noncurrent line
- Legs agreeing
- 1
- Phase
- watch
- CMBS loans in special servicing
- 0
- Distressed banks
- 0
- Store closures (past year)
- 2
- WARN notices (past year)
- 0
an isolated signal, not a convergence
little to no distressed CRE dollars behind the signals
signals are present but neither credit-material nor ground-heavy
Written from the figures above · CBSA 32580 · geo_metro_signals · last changed 27 Aug 2026
· Ask your own question →
Jobs & Demand — the labor market under the collateralWatch it change →
Every other zone on this page reads the credit — what the loan is doing.
This one reads the demand underneath it. Office jobs pay office rent;
office rent services the office loan. When the jobs go, the DSCR follows — but not for another year or two.
That lag is the whole point of looking here.
Unemployment · Aug 2026
6.3%
-0.5pp yr
Last 24 months
5.3%7.0%
Monthly metro unemployment (BLS LAUS) — the freshest labor signal there is,
about six weeks behind. Read the direction, not the level: a 4% metro that is rising and a 6% metro that is
falling are not telling you the same thing.
Jobs by CRE-relevant sector · 2024
Annual employment by sector (BLS QCEW, 2024; 232,984 jobs in the metro).
QCEW lags — it is the structural read, not the current one, and we pair it with the monthly unemployment above on purpose.
Office-using sums five supersectors; where BLS withholds any one of them for
disclosure, we show nothing rather than a number we know is too low — so a missing sector here means
“suppressed at the source,” not “zero.”
Sector Heat — CMBS distress rate by property type (metro vs national)See the loans behind the bar →
Too few CMBS loans here (12) to say whether this metro's rate is explained by its property mix — that comparison needs 25.
No CMBS sector data for this metro.
Maturity Wall — CMBS coming due by year, distress within eachSee what’s maturing →
$56M — 32% of the metro's balance — matures within two years; the red slice of each bar is already distressed.
Distress Trend — is this market turning?Track it quarter by quarter →
Realized distress is FLAT — 0.0% now (2026-07), +0.0pp over the year.
Same definition as the cards above — distressed means in special servicing or 60+ days delinquent, dollar-weighted — on a different clock. The cards are today’s tape; this is the disclosed history panel, quarter by quarter, so you can read direction rather than level. Trusts file monthly, so a quarter is usually well covered within weeks of opening and the newest one shown is normally the current one; it is withheld only when its filed book falls below 60% of recent quarters.
Share of the metro’s CMBS in special servicing or 60+ days delinquent, by quarter — a firmer, backward-looking read. A loan under 1.0x DSCR that is still paying is not counted here.
Submarket Heat — where in the metro the distress sitsOpen the submarket →
The top three submarkets hold $173M of the metro's $173M; each bar's colored share is its distress rate.
Bank Door — what the local bank sector could absorbSee it on every loan’s exit read →
$56M of CMBS matures here within two years.
The 16 regional and local banks that gather deposits here could write roughly
$1.5B more CRE before the 300% supervisory line, so the maturing balance is
0.04× that room.
The median metro sits at 0.13×.
Regional Bank Room
$1.5B
After Committed Draws
$791M / −47%
Maturing ÷ Room
0.04×
Banks In Footprint
16 / 1 at the line
The room above is already part-sold. Construction lending is a promise drawn
down over two or three years, and the undrawn part is an obligation the bank cannot decline while the borrower performs
— every one of those dollars lands in the same CRE book the 300% line governs. These banks
have $978M of construction committed and not yet
advanced, of which $708M
comes out of the room above, leaving $791M,
with 9 banks
whose entire remaining room is spoken for.
A bank with no room contributes zero here, never a negative one — capacity does not net
across balance sheets — so $269M of what has
been promised is not deducted at all, because there is nothing left to deduct it from. On today’s
capital that is funding already contracted which would cross the line as it draws.
SR 06-26 draws a second line at 100% of capital for construction and land:
5 of 16
are past it on drawn balances alone, and
8 more cross it
once their own commitments fund.
Counted — 16 regional & local CRE lenders
| Bank | Deposit share | CRE / Capital* | Room contributed | Noncurrent CRE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| International Bank Of Commerce TX | 61.4% | 128% total 144%
|
🔒 | 4.42% |
| Lone Star National Bank TX | 78.5% | 207% total 276%
|
🔒 | 1.31% |
| Frost Bank TX | 2.1% | 123% total 208%
|
🔒 | 0.74% |
| Texas National Bank TX | 83.4% | 248% total 327%
|
🔒 | 0.13% |
| Rio Bank TX | 59.4% | 242% total 329%
|
🔒 | 0.06% |
| Plainscapital Bank TX | 7.6% | 255% total 369%
|
🔒 | 0.54% |
| Freedom Bank TX | 76.1% | 158% total 269%
|
🔒 | 0.15% |
| Greater State Bank TX | 81.5% | 219% total 355%
|
🔒 | 0.10% |
| Bank Of South Texas TX | 59.9% | 253% total 302%
|
🔒 | 0.08% |
| Texas Regional Bank TX | 30.1% | 295% total 391%
|
🔒 | 0.02% |
| Texas Community Bank TX | 1.3% | 194% total 272%
|
🔒 | 0.17% |
| First National Bank Texas TX | 0.8% | 206% total 240%
|
🔒 | 0.07% |
| First Community Bank TX | 10.0% | 274% total 353%
|
🔒 | 0.00% |
| Falcon International Bank TX | 3.5% | 285% total 352%
|
🔒 | 0.00% |
| Vantage Bank Texas TX | 37.3% | 314% total 424%
|
🔒 | 1.04% |
| International Bank Of Commerce TX | 0.0% | 215% total 236%
|
🔒 | 0.90% |
Not counted — 4 banks with deposits here
These hold deposits in this metro but are left out of the capacity above, because for them deposit location stops indicating where they lend — or they do not lend CRE at all. Real money that could refinance here is deliberately not counted.
no CRE book — CRE under 100% of capital — not a CRE lender
Jpmorgan Chase Bank, National Association OH · Pnc Bank, National Association DE · Bank Of America, National Association NC · Wells Fargo Bank, National Association SD
* Two ratios, two perimeters.
The large figure is supervisory CRE over total risk-based capital —
construction, multifamily and non-owner-occupied nonfarm nonresidential. That is the book SR 06-26 draws its
300% line against, and it is what the red coloring and the room contributed are both measured on.
Total beneath it adds owner-occupied CRE — lending to a business on
its own premises — which the guidance deliberately leaves out. A bank can sit well above 300% on total CRE and
still be inside the line, with real room to lend; both are shown so the gap is visible rather than surprising.
How to read this. It is not whether any particular loan can refinance — a borrower also reaches
national banks, life companies, agencies and debt funds. It is how much of this metro’s maturing volume the local
bank sector could absorb if it were the only door.
Banks are placed by deposit share (FDIC Summary of Deposits, June 2026) — a proxy for
where they lend, not a measurement; call reports carry no collateral geography. Room = 3× total risk-based capital less CRE held
(SR 06-26, the capital base the rule names — not book equity), from Q2 2026 call reports, apportioned by that share.
Committed construction comes from FFIEC Schedule RC-L as filed at 2026-06-30 —
the undrawn half of loans already written, which the balance sheet above does not show.
Banks in more than 5 states, single-branch bookers and banks that do not lend CRE are excluded —
315 banks holding $263.8B of national capacity not counted here.
Local Lenders — banks headquartered here, worst CRE noncurrent firstUnlock each bank’s early-warning flag →
| Bank | Total CRE | CRE / Capital* | Noncurrent CRE | Early Warning |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lone Star National Bank | $1.3B | 207% total 276%
|
1.31% | 🔒 |
| Greater State Bank | $77M | 219% total 355%
|
0.10% | 🔒 |
| Rio Bank | $496M | 242% total 329%
|
0.06% | 🔒 |
| Freedom Bank | $98M | 158% total 269%
|
0.15% | 🔒 |
| Texas National Bank | $437M | 248% total 327%
|
0.13% | 🔒 |
| Bank Of South Texas | $85M | 253% total 302%
|
0.08% | 🔒 |
* Two ratios, two perimeters.
The large figure is supervisory CRE over total risk-based capital —
construction, multifamily and non-owner-occupied nonfarm nonresidential. That is the book SR 06-26 draws its
300% line against, and it is what the red coloring and the room contributed are both measured on.
Total beneath it adds owner-occupied CRE — lending to a business on
its own premises — which the guidance deliberately leaves out. A bank can sit well above 300% on total CRE and
still be inside the line, with real room to lend; both are shown so the gap is visible rather than surprising.
Banks are matched to their HQ metro (a proxy for footprint). Noncurrent CRE = CRE-balance-weighted blend of multifamily / nonresidential / construction noncurrent (distress already arrived). Early Warning is a validated leading signal — the bank’s 30-89 early-delinquency rank among all CRE lenders this quarter, which has predicted ~2.3× forward CRE distress. Per-bank flags are on a plan.
Do the banks lending in McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, TX have the capacity to refinance its maturing CRE?
For McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, TX, the answer appears to be yes: with 16 banks qualifying and 0 banks excluded here, the metro's maturing CMBS balance of $56.2mm (across 5 maturing loans) is small against regional and community bank room, leaving $790.9mm available after committed draws and producing a wall-to-room ratio of 0.07 (0.04 before committed draws) — well below the median of 0.24, ranking it 219 of 275 counting from the most strained. That said, the wall is CMBS only — the maturing debt this platform can see, not the metro's whole maturity load — and room is a proxy built on deposit footprint rather than a measurement of lending footprint, so the ratio is an upper bound on how much of that maturing debt local banks would have to absorb; with a distressed share of 0.0%, there is no visible stress signal in this reading.
The figures behind this answer
- CMBS maturing in the window
- $56.2mm
- … across this many loans
- 5
- Local bank room, before committed draws
- $1.50bn
- Committed construction draws
- $977.7mm
- Local bank room, after those draws
- $790.9mm
- Wall-to-room ratio
- 0.07
- Rank, most strained
- 219
- … out of this many metros ranked
- 275
- … before committed draws
- 0.04
- Population ranked against
- CMBS maturing within 24 months against regional/community bank room in this metro
- Qualifying local banks
- 16
- … excluded from the calculation
- 0
- Distressed share of this metro's CMBS
- 0.0%
- Total CMBS balance here
- $173.2mm
- Capacity band
- slack
Compared against a median wall-to-room ratio of
0.24 across the ranked metros.
0.07 is BELOW the median of 0.24, so this metro is LESS strained than the typical ranked metro
219 of 275, counting from the MOST strained — a LOWER rank number means MORE strain
Room is what regional and community banks could still write before the SR 06-26 concentration line, after deducting construction draws already committed. Deposit footprint is a proxy for lending footprint, not a measurement of it.
The most extreme ratios belong to the smallest metros.
The wall is the CMBS balance maturing within 24 months — the maturing debt this platform can see, not the metro's whole maturity load. Every ratio is an upper bound on how much of it local banks would have to absorb.
A high ratio is as often an exclusion artifact as a credit event. Banks whose deposits do not indicate where they lend (nationals, card and charter banks) are excluded from the room, so a metro served mainly by those reads strained while its credit is simply invisible here.
Written from the figures above · CBSA 32580 · capacity_metro · last changed 25 Oct 2026
· Ask your own question →
On The Ground — recent closures, layoffs & CRE bankruptciesTie these events to loans →
2 local distress events in the past year — store closures, layoffs, and commercial real estate bankruptcies near this metro's collateral.
2026-10-23
BANKRUPTCY
Chapter 11
2026-10-20
BANKRUPTCY
Chapter 11
2026-10-16
BANKRUPTCY
Chapter 11
2026-10-16
BANKRUPTCY
Chapter 11
2026-10-07
BANKRUPTCY
CRE-linked bankruptcy
2026-10-06
BANKRUPTCY
Chapter 11
2026-10-06
BANKRUPTCY
Chapter 11
2026-10-06
BANKRUPTCY
Chapter 11
2026-05-31
CLOSURE
Mercedes
2025-12-31
CLOSURE
Pharr
2025-07-31
LAYOFF
128 jobs · McAllen
2025-07-31
LAYOFF
93 jobs · Weslaco
2025-07-10
LAYOFF
66 jobs · Edinburg
2025-07-10
LAYOFF
66 jobs · Edinburg
2025-05-14
LAYOFF
64 jobs · Edinburg
What has actually happened on the ground in McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, TX recently?
Over the trailing 365 days in McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, TX, the on-the-ground record shows 2 store closures (ZIP-matched, approved rows only), alongside 0 warn_notices and jobs_affected of 0 — the latter a floor, since notices stating no headcount count but contribute 0 jobs. On the bankruptcy side, the reading is 101 cre_bankruptcies, but this is a STATE PROXY — a court case counts in its filing district and an SEC 8-K in the filer's state, not where the property is, so it counts CRE-likely filings in the states this metro's collateral sits in and is not a metro-native count; coverage also widened on 2026-09-16, so counts before and after that date are not comparable.
The figures behind this answer
- Store closures
- 2
- WARN layoff notices
- 0
- Jobs on those notices
- 0
- CRE-related bankruptcies
- 101
- Window, in days
- 365
STATE PROXY — a court case counts in its filing district and an SEC 8-K in the filer's state, not where the property is, so this counts CRE-likely filings in the states this metro's collateral sits in. It is not a metro-native count. Each court case is counted once even when both PACER and CourtListener carry it. A court case's state is its filing district; an SEC 8-K or news item carries the filer's state. Coverage widened to both court feeds on 2026-09-16, so counts before and after that date are not comparable.
affected_employees is nullable — notices that state no headcount are counted but contribute 0 jobs, so this is a floor.
Closures are matched ZIP -> CBSA and only APPROVED rows count (a pending, machine-extracted row is not yet a closure). This mirrors the Metro Pulse page, not the convergence board — the board applies neither filter and counts higher. Layoffs take the same ZIP -> CBSA and review treatment, and a WARN notice counts if it affects >= 10 people or does not state a headcount (a NULL is not 'fewer than 10').
Written from the figures above · CBSA 32580 · geo_events · last changed 25 Oct 2026
· Ask your own question →
What this page can’t do
Everything above is a snapshot — one market, as it stands today, and
it’s yours to read. What a snapshot can’t tell you is when it moves: which loan slipped a DSCR band
this month, which bank’s early-warning rank crossed into the top quartile, which submarket started turning
while the headline number still looked fine. Distress doesn’t announce itself on the day you happen to check.
This page
One metro · one moment · you come looking.
Verstavo
Every metro · every month · it comes looking for you.
CMBS covers the securitized slice of CRE; bank, closure and layoff signals widen the view.
“No data” in a zone means we don’t observe it here, not that there is no stress.
Employment is BLS (QCEW annual, LAUS monthly) — public data, and the demand leg under all of it.
See the whole picture, not just the pulse.
Metro Pulse is the free, public read — one page for every market we cover. The platform goes loan‑by‑loan inside it: which buildings carry the stress, when their debt comes due, and your own portfolio benchmarked against the market you are standing in.