Verstavo
Start free trial No credit card required
← All markets · The national picture →

Commercial Real Estate Credit —
Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, TX

The state of disclosed CRE credit in this market · TX
The read
$1.7B of CMBS across 81 loans. Distress is easing in the filed record — 14.1% as of 2026-07. The heaviest maturity load lands in 2031 ($471M, 28% of the book). 34 on-the-ground distress events in the past year (1,484 jobs).
Overview
CMBS
Submarkets
Local Banks
Jobs & Demand
On The Ground
Loading map…
The CMBS properties our stress model flags here, plus recent store closures and layoffs. Stressed is a wider net than distressed — the distressed figure above counts only loans already in special servicing or 60+ days delinquent, while these dots also include performing loans facing maturity or coverage pressure. Property dots sit at the center of their ZIP code, not the building — they show where stress concentrates, not which asset. Closures and layoffs are pinned to address where we have it. Open any dot to the building and the loan behind it →
In Austin, the Filed Record Cools While the Street-Level Ledger Keeps Printing

Austin carries $1.7 billion of CMBS across 81 loans, and the headline from the servicer record is that distress is easing: the filed rate stood at 14.1% as of July 2026, down on a falling trend, with a median DSCR of 1.93 across the book. That is an observation worth holding onto — the measured distress here is moving the right way, not the wrong one. The book sits roughly balanced across sectors, with retail, multifamily and office each around $0.4 billion and hospitality near $0.3 billion.

The maturity calendar is where the weight gathers later rather than sooner. The heaviest load lands in 2031, at $471 million, or 28% of the book, and that tranche currently shows no filed distress. The nearer rungs are lighter — roughly $0.5 billion comes due inside 24 months — but the 2028 slice reads as heavily distressed in the filed record, a reminder that an easing aggregate can still conceal a stressed vintage.

Against the cooling servicer data runs a busier street-level ledger: 34 on-the-ground distress events in the past year, split between 20 store closures and 14 layoff notices totaling 1,484 jobs. The broader labor backdrop remains firm, with unemployment at 3.9% as of August 2026, up just 0.1 point year over year. Among the nine banks tracked here, one is flagged distressed and one sits on early warning — a thin but non-zero signal beneath an otherwise steadying picture.

Written 2026-10-27
CMBS Distressed UPB
$221M / 12.9% in special servicing or 60+ days delinquent
CMBS Maturing ≤ 24mo
$484M
Banks HQ’d Here (stressed)
1 / 9
Bank Early-Warning
1 flagged
Store Closures (1y)
20
Layoff Notices (1y)
14 / 1,484 jobs 0.14% of metro employment
CMBS Loans / UPB
81 / $1.7B
Unemployment · Aug 2026
3.9% +0.1pp yr

How much CRE distress is there in Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, TX right now?

Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, TX is showing distress across all four measured signals, with every leg reading elevated. Store closures sit at 13 closures (ranked 34th of 392 by count), while layoff notices hit 17 notices (ranked 42nd of 386). Bank CRE over the noncurrent line totals $1,320.9mm (ranked 36th of 393), and securitized loans in special servicing stand at 10 rows (ranked 20th of 335). All six possible pairs of signals agree that stress is elevated — none are quiet, and none disagree. One caveat: the store-closures reading is elevated on size, not on rate, ranking 250th of 392 by closures per 100,000 jobs while still clearing the flat count threshold, so that leg is on the list because the metro is large rather than stressed per unit of itself.

The figures behind this answer
SignalLevel Rate Rank by count Rank by rate Reading
store closures
store closures per 100,000 jobs
13 closures 1.21 per 100k jobs 34 of 392 250 of 392 elevated
trailing 365 days to today
layoff notices (WARN)
workers on layoff notices as a share of the metro's employment
17 notices 0.09% 42 of 386 174 of 386 elevated
trailing 365 days to today
bank CRE at lenders over the noncurrent line
share of the CRE lent into this metro that sits at a lender over the blended-noncurrent line
$1.32bn 8.65% 36 of 393 85 of 393 elevated
allocated
2026-03-31
securitized loans in special servicing
share of the securitized balance read here that is in special servicing
10 loan records 14.09% 20 of 335 36 of 335 elevated
2026-07-29
6 pairs compared 6 both elevated 0 both quiet 0 disagreeing 0 unreadable — a side is blind 4 of four legs elevated
one metro, four independent feeds, each on its own denominator
114 of 441 metros have at least one blind leg and 48 are blind on all four. Those 48 are the same metros the board's map cannot place and the metro resolver cannot name: one ZIP-to-CBSA crosswalk boundary, showing up three ways.
Elevation is computed on the COUNT, over a flat threshold, which is a size filter. New York is 2nd of 392 by store closures and 264th of the same 392 by closures per job — both true, and which one you lead with decides what the reader believes.
Where two legs disagree, that is usually a fact about WHICH mechanism is running, not an error in either feed and not a worse metro.
A leg with no denominator, or whose numerator cannot be measured, reads LOW and means nothing. Each leg publishes a measurement state (allocated, floor, measured, no denominator, no rate, not measurable) for that reason.
elevated by size, not by rate — store closures clear a flat count threshold while sitting below the median of their own rate ranking. Any reading that leans on them is a statement about how big this metro is.
Store closures: divided by 1,074,287 jobs — all metro jobs, QCEW annual average — a SIZE normaliser, not a matched population: the feed spans retail, food service and pharmacy and no single QCEW sector covers it. The MATCHED read sits beside it as this leg's second reading (trailing 365 days to today).
Layoff notices (WARN): divided by 1,505,300 employed — employed persons, BLS LAUS, not seasonally adjusted (trailing 365 days to today).
Bank CRE at lenders over the noncurrent line: divided by $15,262.5 mm — bank CRE allocated to this metro by branch deposits (2026-03-31).
Securitized loans in special servicing: divided by $1,675.0 mm — current balance on the non-pari-passu rows of this tape — the trust's slice, not the whole loan, on both sides of the ratio (2026-07-29).
Written from the figures above · CBSA 12420 · stress_metro · last changed 28 Aug 2026 · Ask your own question →

Which distress signals are elevated in Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, TX, and which cannot be read?

In Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, TX, elevated distress signals include bank distressed CRE (9.0% of bank CRE at risk at the 90th percentile, $15.26bn bank CRE with $1.32bn distressed), CMBS special servicing ($236.0mm, 14.1% of metro UPB), store closures (13 in the past year), and WARN notices (17). The reading on the bank allocation exact share is unavailable, as no figure is provided for that metric.

The figures behind this answer
CMBS in special servicing
$236.0mm
… as a share of this metro's CMBS balance
14.1%
Bank CRE lent into this metro
$15.26bn
… at risk at the 90th percentile
16.7%
CRE at lenders over the noncurrent line
$1.32bn
Assets at those lenders
$0.40bn
… share needing no branch-deposit allocation
9.0%
Signals reading elevated
bank CRE over the noncurrent line, CMBS in special servicing, store closures, WARN layoff notices
Legs agreeing
4
Phase
peak
CMBS loans in special servicing
10
Distressed banks
1
Store closures (past year)
13
WARN notices (past year)
17
leading (real-economy) and realized (credit) signals are firing together
hundreds of millions of distressed CRE exposure
credit distress AND ground-level distress, with real dollars behind the credit side
Written from the figures above · CBSA 12420 · geo_metro_signals · last changed 28 Aug 2026 · Ask your own question →
Jobs & Demand — the labor market under the collateralWatch it change →
Every other zone on this page reads the credit — what the loan is doing. This one reads the demand underneath it. Office jobs pay office rent; office rent services the office loan. When the jobs go, the DSCR follows — but not for another year or two. That lag is the whole point of looking here.
Unemployment · Aug 2026
3.9% +0.1pp yr
Last 24 months
3.1%4.1%
Monthly metro unemployment (BLS LAUS) — the freshest labor signal there is, about six weeks behind. Read the direction, not the level: a 4% metro that is rising and a 6% metro that is falling are not telling you the same thing.
Jobs by CRE-relevant sector · 2024
Retail trade
117,542 jobs · +1.0% yr
Industrial
31,107 jobs · +2.7% yr
Annual employment by sector (BLS QCEW, 2024; 1,074,287 jobs in the metro). QCEW lags — it is the structural read, not the current one, and we pair it with the monthly unemployment above on purpose. Office-using sums five supersectors; where BLS withholds any one of them for disclosure, we show nothing rather than a number we know is too low — so a missing sector here means “suppressed at the source,” not “zero.”
Sector Heat — CMBS distress rate by property type (metro vs national)See the loans behind the bar →
This metro's CMBS runs 12.9% distressed where its own property mix predicts 6.3% — $114M more than this book would carry at the rate each property type runs elsewhere in the country, dollar-weighted and excluding this metro. The gap is measured; the cause is not.
Hospitality
rate not reported · $260M
Multifamily
rate not reported · $415M
Office
rate not reported · $383M
Retail
rate not reported · $446M
Elimination — does the gap survive a control?
Each row re-prices this metro's book on a finer cell — its own property types, then those types split by loan size, then by vintage — always at the rate that cell runs elsewhere in the country, dollar-weighted. A gap that shrinks toward zero is explained by the control; one that stays has ruled it out. What is measured is what survives, not a cause.
property mix alone
+6.6pp
… and loan size held fixed
+6.2pp
the gap is still there with loan size held fixed too
… and vintage held fixed
+7.2pp
the gap is still there with vintage held fixed too
The largest single contributor is Multifamily: 11 loans, $415M, where the same type runs 7.7% elsewhere. Its own rate and its part of the gap are not shown: fewer than 3 loans are distressed here, too few for the share to be a rate.
Maturity Wall — CMBS coming due by year, distress within eachSee what’s maturing →
$484M — 28% of the metro's balance — matures within two years; the red slice of each bar is already distressed.
2026
$4M · 1 loan · 0.0%
2027
$233M · 13 loans · distress not reported
2028
$268M · 11 loans · 69.2%
2029
$392M · 23 loans · distress not reported
2030
$205M · 9 loans · distress not reported
2031
$471M · 14 loans · 0.0%
2032
$40M · 3 loans · 0.0%
2033
$59M · 4 loans · 0.0%
2034
$5M · 1 loan · 0.0%
2035
$12M · 1 loan · 0.0%
2036
$24M · 1 loan · 0.0%
Distress Trend — is this market turning?Track it quarter by quarter →
Realized distress is FALLING — 14.1% now (2026-07), -1.8pp over the year.
Same definition as the cards above — distressed means in special servicing or 60+ days delinquent, dollar-weighted — on a different clock. The cards are today’s tape; this is the disclosed history panel, quarter by quarter, so you can read direction rather than level. Trusts file monthly, so a quarter is usually well covered within weeks of opening and the newest one shown is normally the current one; it is withheld only when its filed book falls below 60% of recent quarters.
Share of the metro’s CMBS in special servicing or 60+ days delinquent, by quarter — a firmer, backward-looking read. A loan under 1.0x DSCR that is still paying is not counted here.
Submarket Heat — where in the metro the distress sitsOpen the submarket →
The top three submarkets hold $1.3B of the metro's $1.7B; each bar's colored share is its distress rate.
The Domain / North Austin
$600M · distress not reported
South Congress / South Austin
$347M · distress not reported
Downtown Austin
$309M · distress not reported
Round Rock / Cedar Park
$212M · distress not reported
West Lake Hills / Lake Travis
$108M · distress not reported
San Marcos / Buda / Kyle
$92M · 0.0%
East Austin
$24M · 0.0%
Lockhart / Luling
$16M · 0.0%
Bastrop / Elgin
$4M · 0.0%
Bank Door — what the local bank sector could absorbSee it on every loan’s exit read →
$484M of CMBS matures here within two years. The 43 regional and local banks that gather deposits here could write roughly $5.3B more CRE before the 300% supervisory line, so the maturing balance is 0.09× that room. The median metro sits at 0.13×.
Regional Bank Room
$5.3B
After Committed Draws
$3.6B / −31%
Maturing ÷ Room
0.09×
Banks In Footprint
43 / 7 at the line
The room above is already part-sold. Construction lending is a promise drawn down over two or three years, and the undrawn part is an obligation the bank cannot decline while the borrower performs — every one of those dollars lands in the same CRE book the 300% line governs. These banks have $2.0B of construction committed and not yet advanced, of which $1.7B comes out of the room above, leaving $3.6B, with 22 banks whose entire remaining room is spoken for. A bank with no room contributes zero here, never a negative one — capacity does not net across balance sheets — so $398M of what has been promised is not deducted at all, because there is nothing left to deduct it from. On today’s capital that is funding already contracted which would cross the line as it draws. SR 06-26 draws a second line at 100% of capital for construction and land: 13 of 43 are past it on drawn balances alone, and 16 more cross it once their own commitments fund.
Counted — 43 regional & local CRE lenders
BankDeposit shareCRE / Capital*Room contributedNoncurrent CRE
Texas Capital Bank TX 33.1% 105%
total 130%
🔒 0.77%
Frost Bank TX 12.0% 123%
total 208%
🔒 0.74%
Prosperity Bank TX 6.1% 171%
total 228%
🔒 0.18%
The First National Bank Of Bastrop TX 97.4% 182%
total 239%
🔒 0.19%
First Texas Bank TX 69.0% 162%
total 270%
🔒 0.67%
Verabank, National Association TX 16.8% 166%
total 253%
🔒 0.96%
Broadway National Bank TX 13.7% 176%
total 244%
🔒 0.03%
International Bank Of Commerce TX 6.2% 215%
total 236%
🔒 0.90%
Horizon Bank, Ssb TX 89.8% 254%
total 420%
🔒 0.00%
Plainscapital Bank TX 14.5% 255%
total 369%
🔒 0.54%
Frontier Bank Of Texas TX 100.0% 231%
total 444%
🔒 0.00%
Southstar Bank, S.s.b. TX 28.6% 155%
total 214%
🔒 1.19%
Third Coast Bank TX 11.9% 236%
total 309%
🔒 0.43%
Round Top State Bank TX 30.8% 148%
total 215%
🔒 0.25%
R Bank TX 78.9% 256%
total 418%
🔒 2.76%
Ozona Bank TX 58.2% 174%
total 237%
🔒 0.00%
Citizens National Bank TX 46.2% 237%
total 302%
🔒 0.00%
Susser Bank TX 15.3% 243%
total 309%
🔒 0.44%
Classic Bank, National Association TX 16.4% 125%
total 228%
🔒 2.29%
First United Bank And Trust Company OK 4.6% 280%
total 344%
🔒 1.37%
Cornerstone Capital Bank, Ssb TX 2.2% 147%
total 176%
🔒 0.15%
Benchmark Bank TX 14.7% 254%
total 308%
🔒 0.00%
Security State Bank & Trust TX 10.3% 266%
total 346%
🔒 3.45%
Primebank Of Texas TX 40.9% 236%
total 366%
🔒 0.00%
First National Bank Texas TX 1.9% 206%
total 240%
🔒 0.07%
Central National Bank TX 17.9% 274%
total 351%
🔒 0.09%
Extraco Banks, National Association TX 1.4% 149%
total 201%
🔒 0.00%
Citizens State Bank TX 22.2% 268%
total 326%
🔒 4.98%
Rio Bank TX 4.1% 242%
total 329%
🔒 0.06%
Southside Bank TX 2.2% 289%
total 324%
🔒 0.09%
Security Bank Of Texas TX 16.0% 231%
total 283%
🔒 2.88%
The Moody National Bank TX 3.6% 278%
total 364%
🔒 1.18%
Texas Regional Bank TX 9.3% 295%
total 391%
🔒 0.02%
Jefferson Bank TX 1.0% 251%
total 352%
🔒 1.04%
Hancock Whitney Bank MS 0.0% 146%
total 229%
🔒 0.26%
Falcon International Bank TX 0.7% 285%
total 352%
🔒 0.00%
First Lockhart Bank TX 98.8% 365%
total 510%
🔒 0.16%
American Bank Of Commerce TX 45.3% 365%
total 507%
🔒 0.06%
Sage Capital Bank, TX 33.7% 329%
total 391%
🔒 0.00%
The First National Bank Of Sonora TX 7.1% 327%
total 439%
🔒 2.28%
Schertz Bank & Trust TX 5.8% 345%
total 467%
🔒 0.00%
Alliance Bank Central Texas TX 4.7% 302%
total 391%
🔒 0.02%
Southwestern National Bank TX 2.8% 321%
total 540%
🔒 0.34%
Not counted — 28 banks with deposits here
These hold deposits in this metro but are left out of the capacity above, because for them deposit location stops indicating where they lend — or they do not lend CRE at all. Real money that could refinance here is deliberately not counted.
no CRE book — CRE under 100% of capital — not a CRE lender
Jpmorgan Chase Bank, National Association OH · Wells Fargo Bank, National Association SD · Bank Of America, National Association NC · Pnc Bank, National Association DE · Fifth Third Bank, National Association OH · Truist Bank NC · Regions Bank AL · Austin Capital Bank Ssb TX · The Huntington National Bank OH · First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company NC · The City National Bank Of Taylor TX · First American Trust, Fsb CA · The Northern Trust Company IL · Anthem Bank & Trust LA · Amarillo National Bank TX · Trusttexas Bank, Ssb TX · Cibc National Trust Company GA
national — operates in more than 5 states, so deposits stop indicating where it lends
Bank Ozk AR · Sunflower Bank, National Association TX · Southstate Bank, National Association FL · Nbh Bank CO · Zions Bancorporation, N.a. UT · Woodforest National Bank TX · Centennial Bank AR · Glacier Bank MT · Woori America Bank NY · Encore Bank AR · Wafd Bank WA
* Two ratios, two perimeters. The large figure is supervisory CRE over total risk-based capital — construction, multifamily and non-owner-occupied nonfarm nonresidential. That is the book SR 06-26 draws its 300% line against, and it is what the red coloring and the room contributed are both measured on. Total beneath it adds owner-occupied CRE — lending to a business on its own premises — which the guidance deliberately leaves out. A bank can sit well above 300% on total CRE and still be inside the line, with real room to lend; both are shown so the gap is visible rather than surprising.
How to read this. It is not whether any particular loan can refinance — a borrower also reaches national banks, life companies, agencies and debt funds. It is how much of this metro’s maturing volume the local bank sector could absorb if it were the only door. Banks are placed by deposit share (FDIC Summary of Deposits, June 2026) — a proxy for where they lend, not a measurement; call reports carry no collateral geography. Room = 3× total risk-based capital less CRE held (SR 06-26, the capital base the rule names — not book equity), from Q2 2026 call reports, apportioned by that share. Committed construction comes from FFIEC Schedule RC-L as filed at 2026-06-30 — the undrawn half of loans already written, which the balance sheet above does not show. Banks in more than 5 states, single-branch bookers and banks that do not lend CRE are excluded — 315 banks holding $263.8B of national capacity not counted here.
Local Lenders — banks headquartered here, worst CRE noncurrent firstUnlock each bank’s early-warning flag →
BankTotal CRECRE / Capital*Noncurrent CREEarly Warning
First Lockhart Bank $196M 365%
total 510%
0.16% 🔒
R Bank $422M 256%
total 418%
2.76% 🔒
First Texas Bank $401M 162%
total 270%
0.67% 🔒
The First National Bank Of Bastrop $318M 182%
total 239%
0.19% 🔒
Primebank Of Texas $116M 236%
total 366%
0.00% 🔒
Frontier Bank Of Texas $482M 231%
total 444%
0.00% 🔒
Horizon Bank, Ssb $1.0B 254%
total 420%
0.00% 🔒
* Two ratios, two perimeters. The large figure is supervisory CRE over total risk-based capital — construction, multifamily and non-owner-occupied nonfarm nonresidential. That is the book SR 06-26 draws its 300% line against, and it is what the red coloring and the room contributed are both measured on. Total beneath it adds owner-occupied CRE — lending to a business on its own premises — which the guidance deliberately leaves out. A bank can sit well above 300% on total CRE and still be inside the line, with real room to lend; both are shown so the gap is visible rather than surprising.
Banks are matched to their HQ metro (a proxy for footprint). Noncurrent CRE = CRE-balance-weighted blend of multifamily / nonresidential / construction noncurrent (distress already arrived). Early Warning is a validated leading signal — the bank’s 30-89 early-delinquency rank among all CRE lenders this quarter, which has predicted ~2.3× forward CRE distress. Per-bank flags are on a plan.

Do the banks lending in Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, TX have the capacity to refinance its maturing CRE?

Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos reads as slack, not strained: its 43 qualifying banks hold $5.26bn of room before committed construction draws and $3.61bn after, against a 24-month CMBS wall of $484.2mm across 23 maturing loans, a wall-to-room ratio of 0.13 — and 0.09 before committed draws — ranking it 184 of 275 counting from the most strained. Two cautions temper any refinancing read: the wall is CMBS only, so it is the debt this platform can see rather than the metro's whole maturity load, and room is a deposit-footprint proxy capped by the SR 06-26 concentration line, with 11 banks excluded from the room because their deposits do not indicate where they lend; the local distressed share reading is 12.9%.

The figures behind this answer
CMBS maturing in the window
$484.2mm
… across this many loans
23
Local bank room, before committed draws
$5.26bn
Committed construction draws
$2.05bn
Local bank room, after those draws
$3.61bn
Wall-to-room ratio
0.13
Rank, most strained
184
… out of this many metros ranked
275
… before committed draws
0.09
Population ranked against
CMBS maturing within 24 months against regional/community bank room in this metro
Qualifying local banks
43
… excluded from the calculation
11
Distressed share of this metro's CMBS
12.9%
Total CMBS balance here
$1.71bn
Capacity band
slack
Compared against a median wall-to-room ratio of 0.24 across the ranked metros.
0.13 is BELOW the median of 0.24, so this metro is LESS strained than the typical ranked metro
184 of 275, counting from the MOST strained — a LOWER rank number means MORE strain
Room is what regional and community banks could still write before the SR 06-26 concentration line, after deducting construction draws already committed. Deposit footprint is a proxy for lending footprint, not a measurement of it.
The most extreme ratios belong to the smallest metros.
The wall is the CMBS balance maturing within 24 months — the maturing debt this platform can see, not the metro's whole maturity load. Every ratio is an upper bound on how much of it local banks would have to absorb.
A high ratio is as often an exclusion artifact as a credit event. Banks whose deposits do not indicate where they lend (nationals, card and charter banks) are excluded from the room, so a metro served mainly by those reads strained while its credit is simply invisible here.
Written from the figures above · CBSA 12420 · capacity_metro · last changed 25 Oct 2026 · Ask your own question →
Apartment-REIT Operating Read — same-store disclosures for this metro · as of 2026-07-30Set against the loan book →
Same-Store NOI
-5.3%
Same-Store Revenue
-3.6%
Occupancy
96.0%
Rent Growth
-4.5%
REITSS NOISS RevenueOccupancyRentAs Of
CPT -3.8% -2.0% 95.9% -4.1% 2026-07-30
MAA -6.7% -3.1% 95.0% -3.9% 2026-07-29
UDR -5.4% -5.8% 97.0% -5.5% 2026-07-27
Same-store operating results disclosed by public apartment REITs (AVB · EQR · ESS · MAA · CPT · UDR) for this market in their quarterly supplements. Directional market context — an operating trend, not a Verstavo score.
On The Ground — recent closures, layoffs & CRE bankruptciesTie these events to loans →
34 local distress events in the past year (1,484 jobs) — store closures, layoffs, and commercial real estate bankruptcies near this metro's collateral.
2026-11-01
CLOSURE
Ikea North America Svcs
Scheduled · San Marcos
2026-10-23
BANKRUPTCY
F-Star Socorro Intermediate Holdings, LLC
Chapter 11
2026-10-20
BANKRUPTCY
Horizon Property Partnership, a Texas Partnership
Chapter 11
2026-10-16
BANKRUPTCY
High Ridge Development LLC
Chapter 11
2026-10-16
BANKRUPTCY
High Ridge Development III LLC
Chapter 11
2026-10-08
CLOSURE
Viral Texas cinnamon roll shop
Austin
2026-10-07
BANKRUPTCY
American Hospitality Properties REIT
CRE-linked bankruptcy
2026-10-06
CLOSURE
Scratch-Made Southern Deli
Pflugerville
2026-10-06
BANKRUPTCY
Teas Ridge Retail Center I LLC
Chapter 11
2026-10-06
BANKRUPTCY
Savage Squad Properties LLC
Chapter 11
2026-10-06
BANKRUPTCY
Travis Property Owner LLC
Chapter 11
2026-09-17
LAYOFF
Oracle
359 jobs · Austin
2026-09-14
CLOSURE
Lobster Restaurant
Austin
2026-09-01
CLOSURE
Rodeo drive business
Austin
2026-08-30
CLOSURE
Ikea North America Svcs
Austin

What has actually happened on the ground in Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, TX recently?

Over the most recent 365-day window, the vetted ground-level reading for Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, TX shows 20 store closures, alongside 14 WARN notices affecting 1,484 jobs — the latter figure being a floor, since notices that state no headcount are counted but contribute 0 jobs. A state-proxy count of 154 CRE-likely bankruptcies is also reported, though that figure is not metro-native: each case is attributed to its filing district or the filer's state rather than the property's location, and coverage widened across both court feeds on 2026-09-16, so counts before and after that date are not comparable. No metro-native bankruptcy reading is available among the figures, so any finer local distress interpretation would be unavailable rather than inferred.

The figures behind this answer
Store closures
20
WARN layoff notices
14
Jobs on those notices
1,484
CRE-related bankruptcies
154
Window, in days
365
STATE PROXY — a court case counts in its filing district and an SEC 8-K in the filer's state, not where the property is, so this counts CRE-likely filings in the states this metro's collateral sits in. It is not a metro-native count. Each court case is counted once even when both PACER and CourtListener carry it. A court case's state is its filing district; an SEC 8-K or news item carries the filer's state. Coverage widened to both court feeds on 2026-09-16, so counts before and after that date are not comparable.
affected_employees is nullable — notices that state no headcount are counted but contribute 0 jobs, so this is a floor.
Closures are matched ZIP -> CBSA and only APPROVED rows count (a pending, machine-extracted row is not yet a closure). This mirrors the Metro Pulse page, not the convergence board — the board applies neither filter and counts higher. Layoffs take the same ZIP -> CBSA and review treatment, and a WARN notice counts if it affects >= 10 people or does not state a headcount (a NULL is not 'fewer than 10').
Written from the figures above · CBSA 12420 · geo_events · last changed 25 Oct 2026 · Ask your own question →
What this page can’t do
Everything above is a snapshot — one market, as it stands today, and it’s yours to read. What a snapshot can’t tell you is when it moves: which loan slipped a DSCR band this month, which bank’s early-warning rank crossed into the top quartile, which submarket started turning while the headline number still looked fine. Distress doesn’t announce itself on the day you happen to check.
This page
One metro · one moment · you come looking.
Verstavo
Every metro · every month · it comes looking for you.
Watch this market → Or see 40 years of it first →
CMBS covers the securitized slice of CRE; bank, closure and layoff signals widen the view. “No data” in a zone means we don’t observe it here, not that there is no stress. Employment is BLS (QCEW annual, LAUS monthly) — public data, and the demand leg under all of it.
See the whole picture, not just the pulse.
Metro Pulse is the free, public read — one page for every market we cover. The platform goes loan‑by‑loan inside it: which buildings carry the stress, when their debt comes due, and your own portfolio benchmarked against the market you are standing in.
Get started free → Sign in No credit card required